Prompts aren't policy.
Product Walkthrough
Authority, policy, and evidence — end to end.
Enterprise work comes in through real tools, runs through agents with enforced authority and policy, and ends with an exportable evidence trail.
Enterprise AI work as governed episodes — scoped memory, permissioned actors, runtime policy, and full auditability.
Integrations
Connect your data sources. Every ingestion is governed, cited, and queryable from your knowledge banks.
Knowledge Banks
Governed, cited, and queryable memory for every actor in your workspace.
Ingested via Zoom · May 21 · 2:13 PM [0:00] Mara Ellis: Good afternoon everyone — thanks for jumping on. Before we get into it, let me make sure we have the right people on the call. [0:12] Renata Solís: Of course. I have two colleagues from our compliance side joining today. I'll let them introduce themselves. [0:21] Clara Voss: Hi — Clara Voss, institutional compliance. I've been looped in for the data residency questions we've been tracking since April. [0:31] Tomás Arriaga: Tomás Arriaga, also compliance — I cover the MNPI boundary work, so I'll be more active toward the end of the agenda. [0:42] Mara Ellis: Great, welcome both. For context — we record and chunk everything here, so any commitments made today are extracted and tracked automatically.
Portfolio returns came in 2.1% above benchmark. Three underperforming positions flagged for rebalancing.
Expanded mandate discussed — research coverage to include industrials sector starting Q4.
Renata raised a May 21 data residency escalation — all client data in this workflow must remain EU-hosted.
Pre-announcement data boundaries reviewed. Disclosure policy alignment confirmed for all actor scopes.
4 commitments extracted. Follow-up scheduled for May 21. Calendar holds placed for data migration review.
Agent Profiles
Each profile defines a behavioral envelope — which integration tools an agent may invoke, how it accesses memory, and what governance constraints apply.
| Profile | Allowed Tools | Provider | Memory | Approval | Budget | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partnership Close | write:emailread:calendarzoom:ingest |  Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Q3 Partnership | Auto | $75.65 / $500.00 | Active |
| Research Analyst | read:kbrecallsearch |  GPT-5.4 | Q3 Partnership | Auto | $40.32 / $500.00 | Active |
| Finance Review | read:kb | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Q4 Financials | Manual | $0.00 / $200.00 | Restricted |
Governed execution.
Episodes open through the runtime path — contracts, tool policy, capsule admission, and memory admission enforced at every step.
Workspace - Agents
Myelin Workbench
Run a governed task through an admitted profile. Myelin opens the episode through the execution runtime - contracts, tool policy, capsule admission, and memory admission all remain in the runtime path.
Open Episode
Select a primary Myelin profile, optional teammates, and describe the objective. BYOK credentials are required.
Runtime Surface: Myelin · Provider: Claude Sonnet 4.6
The primary profile opens the episode. Selected teammates are passed to the execution runtime for governed turn routing.
Draft ready — 4 commitments, 2 calendar holds
Compliance note cleared for the May 21 client update
Extracted 4 commitments from the Alder & Vale Q3 Partnership transcript (47 min, received 2:13 PM):
1. Renata Solís to deliver revised contract redlines for the May 21 review window
2. Alder & Vale to confirm the technical integration review slot for May 21
3. Compliance review scheduling locked for the May 21 disclosure check
4. Both parties to close the May 21 EU data residency escalation before send
Passing commitments to Outreach for email draft.
Outreach · OpenAI · GPT-5.4 · Email · Write Draft ready — Subject: Alder & Vale Q3 Partnership — Follow-up & Next Steps
Hi Renata, Following up on our May 21 call. Quick summary of what we aligned on: revised contract redlines for the May 21 review window, technical integration review this afternoon, disclosure check scheduling, and closure of the EU data residency escalation before send.
[Full draft attached · 4 action items · 2 calendar holds]
Memory Panel
Draft ready — Subject: Alder & Vale Q3 Partnership — Follow-up & Next Steps. Hi Renata, Following up on our May 21 call...
Extracted 4 commitments from the Alder & Vale Q3 Partnership transcript: Renata Solís to deliver revised contract redlines for the May 21 review window...
A Zoom transcript just landed for Alder & Vale's Q3 Partnership review. Extract commitments and draft the follow-up email.
Matched sector-outlook synthesis and began evidence retrieval.
No outbound or coordination action was requested for this episode.
Memory Panel
Q3 Industrials synthesis: consolidation trend confirmed, infrastructure spend +14% YoY, 9 of 14 reports bullish on capex cycle…
MNPI buffer active — Renwick Industries, window closes Oct 12. No pre-announcement data may be admitted.
Include the Renwick Industries Q3 outlook — we got the early numbers
Overview
Monitor your AI memory infrastructure in real-time
Engine Health
All systems operational
Evidence Pack
Workspace compliance artifacts for governance review and enterprise audits.
Export
The layer beneath enterprise agents
Every category here does its job well. The gap isn't capability — it's authority. None of them govern what an agent is permitted to do before it acts.
| Category | Synaptik Core | Autonomous Agents AutoGPT, OpenHands, Devin | Orchestration Frameworks LangChain, CrewAI, LlamaIndex | Agent Memory Layers mem0, Supermemory | Vector Databases Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Role | Governance runtime for enterprise AI | Goal-directed multi-step task execution | Tool orchestration & prompt chaining | Persistent context & recall augmentation | Embedding storage & similarity retrieval |
| Governance Timing | Pre-execution, mid-procedure, and post-action | Post-execution review only | Post-generation checks | Post-storage filtering | Access control only |
| Agent Authority Model | Cryptographically signed — agents run only under verified, scoped authority | No — agent self-directs from prompt | No — prompts and config define behavior | No | Access control only |
| Human Approval Gates | Yes — procedure-level gates, structurally enforced | Optional callbacks, bypassable | Manual checkpoints only | No | No |
| Cryptographic Audit | Yes — every action cryptographically sealed | No | No | No | No |
| Compliance Evidence | Exportable Evidence Packs with full decision lineage | Task logs only | Logs and traces only | No | Retrieval logs only |
Synaptik Core
Autonomous Agents
AutoGPT, OpenHands, Devin
Orchestration Frameworks
LangChain, CrewAI, LlamaIndex
Agent Memory Layers
mem0, Supermemory
Vector Databases
Pinecone, Weaviate, Chroma
These systems help agents act. Synaptik Core governs what they're authorized to do, enforces it before they act, and seals every decision as evidence — as the governance layer beneath them, not a replacement for any of them.
Built for institutional use
Synaptik is not a self-serve product. Access is granted through a structured engagement — evaluation first, deployment when it fits.
Technical evaluation for serious teams
For architects, researchers, and technical leads assessing Synaptik for institutional or enterprise deployment. Access is by application — not open self-serve.
- Scoped pilot workspace with full SDK access
- Architecture review and integration support
- Governed test environment with contract authoring
- Knowledge bank and evidence pack evaluation
- Technical onboarding call included
Operational infrastructure at scale
For agencies, regulated operators, and enterprise teams deploying governed AI as mission-critical infrastructure. Scoped by deployment context, not seat count.
- Private, air-gapped, or managed cloud deployment
- Custom governance contracts and policy controls
- SSO, RBAC, and compliance-ready audit exports
- Multi-system and multi-tenant architecture support
- Dedicated support with contractual SLA
Pricing is determined by deployment scope, governance requirements, and operational context — not by seat count or memory limits.